NIST employee from 1997 to 2011 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Peter Michael Ketcham confirms 9/11 official investigation was a cover-up on a AE (Architects for 9/11 truth) presentation.
Accurate and documented account covering the many organized crimes of degenerate pathological liar, sexual predator and psychopath Bill Clinton and the crimes of he and his wife, Hillary Clinton when Bill was governor of Arkansas and Hillary was with the Rose Law Firm, including Whitewater, CIA cocaine trafficking through Mena, Arkansas throughout the 1980's, money laundering, judicial corruption, bank fraud, many murders and cover-ups and how the media and the hidden power structure behind the scenes protected and continue to protect the Clintons.
Bill Cooper was murdered the 5th of November 2001 most likely due to his prediction of 9/11 and antagonism to the Clinton and Bush administrations. Skip to about 7:00 in to get to the meat. the early stuff is not longer relevant as it is about food for storage and what not. This is hour 3 and hour 4 of William Coopers Whitewater scandal broadcasts that led to Bill Clinton naming William Cooper as "the most dangerous man in America" along with Clinton illegally obtaining Bill's FBI file. If you want to know the truth about Bill Clinton I suggest you listen. If you support clinton you won't be able to stand listening to this. It is literally a truth that will leave you staggered wondering how did this man get the presidency.
Even the BBC is using the words "false flag attack" while questioning the the video showing the shooting of an officer at the Charlie Hebdo offices, in Paris France.
It is reasonable to think that the shooter simply missed the shot, and the officer eventually died from the other wounds, maybe the other inconsistencies can be explained away.
But why are some of the "neighbors" wearing bulletproof vests?
Why is traffic at least apparently closed?
Why did so much blood appeared the day after the officer was shot?
Why did Jeannette Bougrab lied claiming to be a grieving girlfriend?
But most bewildering, why is the BBC rushing to the controversy?
Are they trying to loose even more credibility or hilariously begging for some back? Is this a False Flag about a False Flag? To blame who?
Or... is the objective to mock, confuse, enrage and demoralize?
They, the Illuminati and Masons believe in order out of chaos, they achieve chaos, but the order they perceive they produce is not different from the mathematical order you find in a spiderweb or the determined impulses that organize insects, the chaos they achieve lately however is way too sloppy, they have not turned soulless enough.
Some Rosicrucian high up there is perhaps getting frustrated and I suppose the answer is being debated in some Masonic lodge to avoid shooting at their own feet again when they give a new script to the Freemasons in charge of the propaganda world wide.
Perhaps they should move on and wait for us numb sheep to forget, like in a week or so? Not so sure, the internet doesn't forget that easily.
Even the BBC, I say "even" because the BBC, along with CNN and other U.S. mainstream media were accomplices in the at least fore-knowledge of the planned murder of thousands of Americans when they reported several minutes early the collapse of building 7, a building not hit by a plane, this building being the third ever steel frame building to collapse supposedly due to fire, the other two being buildings WTC 1 and WTC 2 a few hours earlier the same day during the attacks of 9/11 2001.
But then French President François Hollande blames the Illuminati with a very curious choice of words where he ultimately implicates himself because he is a member of the Freemason lodge GRAND ORIENT DE FRANCE.
Above at minute 3:20 French President Hollande says these Illuminated have nothing to do with Islam:
" ceux qui ont commis ces actes terroristes, ces illuminés, ces fanatiques, n’ont rien à voir avec la religion musulmane "
"Those who commited these acts of terrorism, these Illuminated, these fanatics, have nothing to do with the Muslim religion"
Illuminés means illuminated and illumined, a word commonly used in secret societies like the Freemasons above the blue lodge (lowest levels), to refer to a state of revelation through secret knowledge, which is Gnosticism.
In the following video, the same President Hollande said in 2012 :
"...but, if one blieves, as it is in my case, in the Republic, eventually one has to go through Freemasonry"
"Mais si l'on croît, comme c'est mon cas, dans la République, à un moment il faut passer par la franc-maçonnerie."
It is strange to say the least that a left oriented president uses the word Illuminated while in a position historically controlled by gnostic secret societies, namely French Freemasonry.
It appears as if some wings of Masons are in conflict, like the historical conflict between Continental and British Freemasonry, but at the highest levels all of the significant secret societies like the Rosicrucians share as a common enemy: Christianity in general and the Catholic Church in particular:
"England is lost; she will not escape the French Revolution if the Masonic lodges resemble those I have to unveil. I would even say more: government and all Christianity would long ago have been lost in England if one could suppose its Freemasons to be initiated into the last mysteries of the sect." Mémoires sur la Jacobinisme, II. 195 1818
England did not escape indeed, today artificially maintaining interest rates just at a fraction above 0 and as its public debt reaches its GDP. Are British Masons moving some Charlie strings too? Will our leaders give us an all out religious war to justify bailings and spendings worldwide?
French Freemasons err through the dangers of Gnosticism by the deceiving and ruthless ways of the Hashishin, the stubborn heart of the Pharaoh of Exodus 7:4-14 , the evil of the Babylonian mysteries.
At the end of this writing is a link to a video available (only in french) that shows the magnitude of this evil. President Hollande has bee has been officially implicated in criminal sex rituals along with Jack Lang et Pierre Moscovici.
So I am rather focusing on the media "je suis Charlie" dangerous hype: It is now clear to me that sooner or later, haters will hate you no matter what you do or who you are, and lovers will sooner or later love you because of who you really are, the question is: which of these are we trying to be?
Hate, which is rooted in ignorance, can be expressed. Love of God, the true and the greatest good, involves suffering more often than pleasure. If that is so, again I ask the question: who are we trying to be?
There is a lot at stake, murder is a great evil, but is the disrespect and inflammatory mockery of the religious beliefs of entire continents under the guise of free speech a good, even wise thing?
Paris, Freemason Lodge of France, Grand temple de la Grande Loge de France.
illuminati card France, Eiffel Towwer, Paris.
A Tree Recognized by its Fruit
"Either make the tree good and its fruit good: or make the tree evil, and its fruit evil. For by the fruit the tree is known. O generation of vipers, how can you speak good things, whereas you are evil? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. A good man out of a good treasure bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of an evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned." (Matthew 12:33-37) DRB
Executive Intelligence Review, Satanism and witchcraft: a concern for the Vatican by Sandro Mitromaco and Ira Liebowitz 1986: PDF
Executive Intelligence Review, Satanic midwife to the New Age of OBE / UNESCO PDF
Executive Intelligence Review, Satan's army's generals expose themselves in recruitment manual. ( This is an elegant exposure of the clumsy intellectual gymnastics of the average satanist apologist) PDF
The movie Doubt shows how the infiltration and accusations can come from very subtle spiritual forces.
A Vatican study and provisional report on New Religious Movements, composed of staff members of different dicasteries of the Holy See: the Pontifical Councils for Culture and for Interreligious Dialogue (which are the principal redactors for this project), the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.