After 9/11 questions multiplied by the thousands but the answer remained a single War on Terror, many questions don't have answers yet, the flight 93 scaled picture bellow will clearly show you how it brings more questions than answers:
But here are some important questions already answerd.
Q Is there any proof about 9/11?
People mean proof of 9/11 being conspiracy or the official account a lie or lies. This can be answered: airplanes were NOT the cause of the destruction of the WTC. The towers fell symmetrically at a speed impossible to achieve without pulling the resisting mass below every single floor below the impact zones of the buildings themselves. There are many more specific examples.
Converlsy, and because of what constitutes proof, the 9/11 official premises are full of contradictions, and regardless of any conclusion drawn there-after, the reasoning can only be a part of a false statement. Contradictions are some of the very few instances which formal logicians can confidently use to prove a statement to be false.
One example, that constitutes academic and scientific proof is: The towers fell at some point or another at free fall speed, available at this link with the title WTC IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE in two paragraphs. (link broken website undergoing changes)
The only dispute to this has come from a group of followers to Simons Hack, maker of the documentary The SEPTEMBER CLUES where their main contention is :
"free fall is not an issue because if some of the video was faked,
it should follow that all videos were faked
and would not constitute reliable evidence,"
...But they fail to explain first,
why all of the videos run at the same speed?
and if they didn't fall at free fall speed, why would they want to accelerate the timeline?
These people have a cult like attitude against those who disagree with them but are exposed elegantly at this forum: http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/960544/1/ on the topic Simon Shack, Killtown, Fred, Ozzy and others are WRONG; But they won't retract...
Q If it is so simple why has nothing changed in 9 years?
R that question follows most frequently as well as naturally after assuming the wrong premise and the wrong conclusion,
it is not so simple, although people usually mean factual instead of simple, what goes beyond this simple proof has compromised almost every aspect of society from economy (trillions in deficit) politics and media, and even further into philosophical and religious positions which become vulnerable if ever daring to depart from obvious truth.
Second, a lot has changed, for the first time in history a simple fact has exposed almost all official structures and established media as corrupt.
Naturally unprecedented investment on 9/11 damage control has been put in place, here it went as far as to defy common sense, scientific inquiry and due process of almost all variations of established justice and law institutions in any constitutional state.
Q What can you change, is it worth even trying, what can you accomplish?
R We may not know the answer to that question in a lifetime and a choice may be quite an individual decision based on personal moral principles which are subjected to change, for good or for worst as we grow as human beings.
But there are ever increasing numbers of people who do not underestimate the impact the 911 truth movement has had, and you can be confident it has at least put out a good fight, there is no courage when there is no compromise in truth, and there is a lot of power and courage involved in the unselfish work for justice, it cannot be faked, people notice and respect sincerity and are naturally drawn to honesty when it is time to grow.
These have been good things during these 9 years after September 11 and we expect much more, 911 truth has often been equated with material support to terrorism by authorities.
But rather it seems, it is 911 truth massive support what exposed 9/11 real terrorism within the authorities and complicity of mainstream media.
Never forget September 11 2001, we never never have.